Just a quick note as Spring has arrived and so has the urge to not be online :-)
Hope everyone enjoys the nice weather !
Tuesday, April 6, 2010
Wednesday, March 24, 2010
10th Amendment Prohibits Government Controlled Marriage
Special Report: 10th Amendment Prohibits Government Controlled Marriage
I got this news report yesterday. It's a great source of info....shows why
conservatives DO have to support polygamy rights for consenting adults.
Awesome !!!
Blessings
Sunnie
10th Amendment Prohibits Government Controlled Marriage - Quotes
http://www.pro-polygamy.com/articles.php?news=0073
The National Polygamy Rights Movement for Consenting Adults
has repeatedly reminded supposed-to-be conservatives that the
10th Amendment makes government controlled marriage
unconstitutional - the exact same 10th Amendment argument
that supposed-to-be conservatives now make against the newly
passed government controlled health care.
I got this news report yesterday. It's a great source of info....shows why
conservatives DO have to support polygamy rights for consenting adults.
Awesome !!!
Blessings
Sunnie
10th Amendment Prohibits Government Controlled Marriage - Quotes
http://www.pro-polygamy.com/articles.php?news=0073
The National Polygamy Rights Movement for Consenting Adults
has repeatedly reminded supposed-to-be conservatives that the
10th Amendment makes government controlled marriage
unconstitutional - the exact same 10th Amendment argument
that supposed-to-be conservatives now make against the newly
passed government controlled health care.
Monday, March 8, 2010
National Polygamy Advocate Mark Henkel did a TV interview on the show, STOSSEL, on March 4, 2010
National Polygamy Advocate Mark Henkel did a TV interview on the show, STOSSEL, on March 4, 2010, on FOX Business Network. He persuasively made the case for consenting adult polygamy with host John Stossel. Also sitting with them, Gretchen Carlson, (co-host of "FOX & Friends") tried to present the anti-polygamy view, using very weak arguments. At the end, she tried to play the "marrying non-humans" argument. Mark Henkel quick joked back with a very humorous statement. Not only did his humorous response totally wipe out the silliness of her "what's next?" argument, but he had everyone laughing including Gretchen Carlson! It was a super way for an interview to end. The video may be seen online now, embedded directly on the website at
http://www.NationalPolygamyAdvocate.com
http://www.NationalPolygamyAdvocate.com
Wednesday, March 3, 2010
This is going to be awesome!
National Polygamy Advocate Mark Henkel is going to be on John Stossel's TV Show on Thursday night, March 4, 2010, at 8:00 pm EST on FOX Business Network. He will be on stage with John Stossel and a woman who co-hosts her own show on FOX News which is another channel. It will be re-broadcast over the next few days after that too. For channel and showtimes, see the "Facebook FAN Page" at
http://www.facebook .com/pages/ Mark-Henkel/ 120790816486
This is going to be awesome!
http://www.facebook .com/pages/ Mark-Henkel/ 120790816486
This is going to be awesome!
Tuesday, March 2, 2010
Spreading the word
Mark Henkel is going to be on TV this week. He will be making an excellent case for polygamy rights for consenting adults. Come join this FAN Page and find out when you can watch it! Being a FAN is one of our ways to show the media that we support polygamy rights and that they should take us seriously.
http://www.facebook.com/pages/Mark-Henkel/120790816486
http://www.facebook.com/pages/Mark-Henkel/120790816486
Wednesday, February 10, 2010
Truth !
The credit belongs to the man who is actually in the arena, whose face is marred by dust and sweat and blood, who knows the great enthusiasms, the great devotions, and spends himself in a worthy cause who at best, if he wins, knows the thrills of high achievement, and, if he fails, at least fails daring greatly, so that his place shall never be with those cold and timid souls who know neither victory nor defeat.
John Fitzgerald Kennedy
John Fitzgerald Kennedy
Friday, January 29, 2010
BITING THE HELPING HAND
There is something that I've seen in the polygamy community that greatly
disturbs me. It is the act I'll call "biting the helping hand".
First let me define something.......
According to Webster's:
Initiative is as an introductory step, energy or aptitude displayed in
initiation of action or at one's own discretion: independently of outside
influence or control.
There are two major kinds of initiative.
One is the person who has the ability or sensitivity to pick up on clues or
hints from others who have seen a need.
They will hear about a need or a comment, heed it, and go and solve the
problem. Even if they themselves never had the problem, someone did, and
they took the hint and filled that need.
The second is the "self-starter." This is the person who sees a need first
and then takes it as his mission to solve it "independently of outside
influence or control".
Our country was founded on initiative! The first settlers, the Revolutionary
warriors, the signers of the Declaration of Independence, the framers of
the Constitution! These are all folks that saw and filled needs. Can you
imagine where we all would be had they not "stepped up" ?
We are all wired differently. Some are leaders and some are more comfortable
as followers or letting others lead.
Some are the kind who don't wanna lead and don't wanna follow.......which
brings me back to the point of this post.
There is a man who saw the need for a "spokesperson" for the entire polygamy
community....one who is able to break past any stereotypes or preconceived
ideas of what and who polygamists are. This man is the National Polygamy
Advocate.
This man did not step up in order to tell people what they wanted to hear...to think he did is silly.
This is the person who sees a need first and then takes it as his mission to solve it "independently of outside influence or control".
He showed Christians that anti-polygamy is unbiblical with Christian polygamy. (yet some polygamists bite the helping hand)
He showed conservatives that anti-polygamy is anti limited government with the polygamy rights win-win solution. (yet some polygamists bite the helping hand)
He showed marriage relationship advocates that they could accept legitimate polygamy
because of love-not-force. (yet some polygamists bite the helping hand)
He showed anti-Mormon Americans that they can see polygamy as not connected
always to Mormonism. By getting anti-Mormons to judge polygamy based on
itself without any connection to Mormonism, he broke their mental barrier to
re-consider polygamy rights. That doesn't make him anti-Mormon, it just
means he has the right message to persuade anti-Mormons that they can accept
polygamy by not connecting it to what they as anti-Mormons don't like about
Mormonism.
(yet some polygamists bite the helping hand)
He showed feminists and egalitarians that they can see polygamy as a
positive woman's choice. By getting such women supporters to judge polygamy
as something that could help single moms and working women, he broke their
mental barrier to reconsider polygamy rights. That doesn't make him a
feminist or egalitarian, it just means he has the right message to persuade
feminists and egalitarians that they can accept polygamy by not seeing it as
if it benefits men but instead seeing it as benefiting women.
He has been able to persuade people to re-think their anti-polygamy
positions. (yet some polygamists bite the helping hand)
Anyone who is pro-polygamy benefits from his successes in
persuading anti-polygamists. (yet some polygamists bite the helping hand)
It doesn't matter what kind of polygamy supporter you are. He is a "self
starter" whose work has never stopped helping the polygamists! Bite marks and all.
If you're a Christian, Mormon, Muslim, Jewish, secular, whatever else.... If you support healthy good polygamy, the work of the National Polygamy Advocate is a helping hand!
To attack him is to "bite the helping hand."
I have seen people attack him... Yet I have never seen him attack anyone, not even those who attack him. That says alot.
It makes me think of how many hand biters there must have always been...The first settlers, the Revolutionary warriors, the signers of the Declaration of Independence, the framers of the Constitution - all probably had hand biters attacking them...but does history speak of them ? Not that I remember from my school days.
So, seriously.......I think it is time for all to smarten up and check ourselves !
We can either be hand biters or helping hands. Does it really make good logic to bash the self-starter? To bash one who saw the need and took the initative?
We have someone who has stood up and is now recognized in the media.
Helping the National Polygamy Advocate, is helping ourselves. He has taken
the initiative, and now so can we can.
Instead of "biting the helping hand," isn't it time we helped instead.... Because it helps ourselves.
Stop "biting the helping hand".
disturbs me. It is the act I'll call "biting the helping hand".
First let me define something.......
According to Webster's:
Initiative is as an introductory step, energy or aptitude displayed in
initiation of action or at one's own discretion: independently of outside
influence or control.
There are two major kinds of initiative.
One is the person who has the ability or sensitivity to pick up on clues or
hints from others who have seen a need.
They will hear about a need or a comment, heed it, and go and solve the
problem. Even if they themselves never had the problem, someone did, and
they took the hint and filled that need.
The second is the "self-starter." This is the person who sees a need first
and then takes it as his mission to solve it "independently of outside
influence or control".
Our country was founded on initiative! The first settlers, the Revolutionary
warriors, the signers of the Declaration of Independence, the framers of
the Constitution! These are all folks that saw and filled needs. Can you
imagine where we all would be had they not "stepped up" ?
We are all wired differently. Some are leaders and some are more comfortable
as followers or letting others lead.
Some are the kind who don't wanna lead and don't wanna follow.......which
brings me back to the point of this post.
There is a man who saw the need for a "spokesperson" for the entire polygamy
community....one who is able to break past any stereotypes or preconceived
ideas of what and who polygamists are. This man is the National Polygamy
Advocate.
This man did not step up in order to tell people what they wanted to hear...to think he did is silly.
This is the person who sees a need first and then takes it as his mission to solve it "independently of outside influence or control".
He showed Christians that anti-polygamy is unbiblical with Christian polygamy. (yet some polygamists bite the helping hand)
He showed conservatives that anti-polygamy is anti limited government with the polygamy rights win-win solution. (yet some polygamists bite the helping hand)
He showed marriage relationship advocates that they could accept legitimate polygamy
because of love-not-force. (yet some polygamists bite the helping hand)
He showed anti-Mormon Americans that they can see polygamy as not connected
always to Mormonism. By getting anti-Mormons to judge polygamy based on
itself without any connection to Mormonism, he broke their mental barrier to
re-consider polygamy rights. That doesn't make him anti-Mormon, it just
means he has the right message to persuade anti-Mormons that they can accept
polygamy by not connecting it to what they as anti-Mormons don't like about
Mormonism.
(yet some polygamists bite the helping hand)
He showed feminists and egalitarians that they can see polygamy as a
positive woman's choice. By getting such women supporters to judge polygamy
as something that could help single moms and working women, he broke their
mental barrier to reconsider polygamy rights. That doesn't make him a
feminist or egalitarian, it just means he has the right message to persuade
feminists and egalitarians that they can accept polygamy by not seeing it as
if it benefits men but instead seeing it as benefiting women.
He has been able to persuade people to re-think their anti-polygamy
positions. (yet some polygamists bite the helping hand)
Anyone who is pro-polygamy benefits from his successes in
persuading anti-polygamists. (yet some polygamists bite the helping hand)
It doesn't matter what kind of polygamy supporter you are. He is a "self
starter" whose work has never stopped helping the polygamists! Bite marks and all.
If you're a Christian, Mormon, Muslim, Jewish, secular, whatever else.... If you support healthy good polygamy, the work of the National Polygamy Advocate is a helping hand!
To attack him is to "bite the helping hand."
I have seen people attack him... Yet I have never seen him attack anyone, not even those who attack him. That says alot.
It makes me think of how many hand biters there must have always been...The first settlers, the Revolutionary warriors, the signers of the Declaration of Independence, the framers of the Constitution - all probably had hand biters attacking them...but does history speak of them ? Not that I remember from my school days.
So, seriously.......I think it is time for all to smarten up and check ourselves !
We can either be hand biters or helping hands. Does it really make good logic to bash the self-starter? To bash one who saw the need and took the initative?
We have someone who has stood up and is now recognized in the media.
Helping the National Polygamy Advocate, is helping ourselves. He has taken
the initiative, and now so can we can.
Instead of "biting the helping hand," isn't it time we helped instead.... Because it helps ourselves.
Stop "biting the helping hand".
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)