Friday, January 29, 2010

BITING THE HELPING HAND

There is something that I've seen in the polygamy community that greatly
disturbs me. It is the act I'll call "biting the helping hand".

First let me define something.......

According to Webster's:

Initiative is as an introductory step, energy or aptitude displayed in
initiation of action or at one's own discretion: independently of outside
influence or control.


There are two major kinds of initiative.

One is the person who has the ability or sensitivity to pick up on clues or
hints from others who have seen a need.
They will hear about a need or a comment, heed it, and go and solve the
problem. Even if they themselves never had the problem, someone did, and
they took the hint and filled that need.

The second is the "self-starter." This is the person who sees a need first
and then takes it as his mission to solve it "independently of outside
influence or control".

Our country was founded on initiative! The first settlers, the Revolutionary
warriors, the signers of the Declaration of Independence, the framers of
the Constitution! These are all folks that saw and filled needs. Can you
imagine where we all would be had they not "stepped up" ?

We are all wired differently. Some are leaders and some are more comfortable
as followers or letting others lead.

Some are the kind who don't wanna lead and don't wanna follow.......which
brings me back to the point of this post.

There is a man who saw the need for a "spokesperson" for the entire polygamy
community....one who is able to break past any stereotypes or preconceived
ideas of what and who polygamists are. This man is the National Polygamy
Advocate.


This man did not step up in order to tell people what they wanted to hear...to think he did is silly.

This is the person who sees a need first and then takes it as his mission to solve it "independently of outside influence or control".

He showed Christians that anti-polygamy is unbiblical with Christian polygamy. (yet some polygamists bite the helping hand)

He showed conservatives that anti-polygamy is anti limited government with the polygamy rights win-win solution. (yet some polygamists bite the helping hand)


He showed marriage relationship advocates that they could accept legitimate polygamy
because of love-not-force. (yet some polygamists bite the helping hand)


He showed anti-Mormon Americans that they can see polygamy as not connected
always to Mormonism. By getting anti-Mormons to judge polygamy based on
itself without any connection to Mormonism, he broke their mental barrier to
re-consider polygamy rights. That doesn't make him anti-Mormon, it just
means he has the right message to persuade anti-Mormons that they can accept
polygamy by not connecting it to what they as anti-Mormons don't like about
Mormonism.

(yet some polygamists bite the helping hand)

He showed feminists and egalitarians that they can see polygamy as a
positive woman's choice. By getting such women supporters to judge polygamy
as something that could help single moms and working women, he broke their
mental barrier to reconsider polygamy rights. That doesn't make him a
feminist or egalitarian, it just means he has the right message to persuade
feminists and egalitarians that they can accept polygamy by not seeing it as
if it benefits men but instead seeing it as benefiting women.

He has been able to persuade people to re-think their anti-polygamy
positions. (yet some polygamists bite the helping hand)


Anyone who is pro-polygamy benefits from his successes in
persuading anti-polygamists. (yet some polygamists bite the helping hand)


It doesn't matter what kind of polygamy supporter you are. He is a "self
starter" whose work has never stopped helping the polygamists! Bite marks and all.
If you're a Christian, Mormon, Muslim, Jewish, secular, whatever else.... If you support healthy good polygamy, the work of the National Polygamy Advocate is a helping hand!

To attack him is to "bite the helping hand."

I have seen people attack him... Yet I have never seen him attack anyone, not even those who attack him. That says alot.

It makes me think of how many hand biters there must have always been...The first settlers, the Revolutionary warriors, the signers of the Declaration of Independence, the framers of the Constitution - all probably had hand biters attacking them...but does history speak of them ? Not that I remember from my school days.

So, seriously.......I think it is time for all to smarten up and check ourselves !
We can either be hand biters or helping hands. Does it really make good logic to bash the self-starter? To bash one who saw the need and took the initative?

We have someone who has stood up and is now recognized in the media.

Helping the National Polygamy Advocate, is helping ourselves. He has taken
the initiative, and now so can we can.

Instead of "biting the helping hand," isn't it time we helped instead.... Because it helps ourselves.

Stop "biting the helping hand".

8 comments:

  1. I'm not sure I understand this:

    "He showed conservatives that anti-polygamy is anti limited government with the polygamy rights win-win solution."

    Is that what you meant to say? I would rather think that "polygamy" ends up being PRO "limited Government" because we would prefer, above all, that Government not be involved in marriage.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Thanks for the comment.

    Actually, what I said and what you said are the same - just structured differently :-)

    ReplyDelete
  3. Why is it though, that Mark doesn't have a name? We're talking about Mark Henkel, aren't we?

    ReplyDelete
  4. sorry I don't understand your train of thought. I thought I responded to your 1st question thoroughly.

    ReplyDelete
  5. And this is why I don't want anything to do with him.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Ok, please bear with me as I am trying to understand you.
    Your comment was basically that polygamy is PRO limited government and I responded that that is exactly what I wrote but in another way - that anti polygamy is anti limited government.

    Your second comment asks why I never mentioned whom I was referring to by name. I really didn't see it as necessary as I was writing about a problem not a person's biography..lol. Yes, of course I was talking Mark
    Henkel and I didn't have any reason for not naming the name. So, yeah, that is who
    I was talking about. :)

    Hugh, It looks like you might be proving the point of my post here. If you don't like him or his success, you are free to your opinion. Your opinion won't change the facts....He is still working for polygamists' freedom...and he keeps succeeding at getting more and more media interviews. He is the helping hand for for polygamy rights. If you want polygamy rights, it makes no sense to bite that hand...even if you don't like him. You can be free
    to keep your opinion but I thinking you should keep it to yourself if you want freedom. You don't have to associate with him. It is obvious that he will keep working and succeeding whether you do or not. So it makes more sense not to bite the helping hand. After all, we have enough enemies with anti-polygamists...it makes no sense to attack someone who is actually succeeding for us on OUR pro-polygamy side! :-D

    ReplyDelete
  7. I have no dislike for Mark based on his "success." I would prefer he do something substantive to make Polygyny legal to engage in without government interference.

    I find that when I try to discuss things with Mark, I cannot. Mark calls his fellow travelers derogatory names, such as "little puddles," deletes all comments that asks questions to clarify on his Facebook page. Calls those who don't donate to HIM, "Socialists," implies we rob him of intellectual material (False, I have not gotten ONE idea at all from Mark), and seems to think that if we don't make a living off of advocacy for polygyny that we are "hobbyists."

    He's not helping. As far as I am concerned he can continue to assign titles to himself, and gather importance to himself and I'll back him, but he is inaccessible, haughty, demanding and he seems to think that if he sees something in the Bible he can copyright it.

    All advocacy has done for ME, is cost me. Jobs, love, money, time, reputation, and my health. He can have it all, but he has to come off that high horse he's on and get down here with the folks.

    Right now I draw more attention (except for MEDIA) than Mark does. I in fact draw more attention than ANYONE. I'd really prefer to have someone advancing the cause so I don't have to, or so that I could help them. This isn't exactly FUN.

    ReplyDelete
  8. You are still free to your opinion :)

    ReplyDelete